MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025732177 · doi:10.1086/430041

Circulating Catecholamines and Cardiorespiratory Responses in Hypoxic Lungfish (<i>Protopterus dolloi</i>): A Comparison of Aquatic and Aerial Hypoxia

2005· article· en· W2025732177 on OpenAlexaff
Steven F. Perry, Kathleen M. Gilmour, Branka Vulesevic, Brian McNeill, Shit F. Chew, Yuen K. Ip

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiological and Biochemical Zoology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersUniversity of Chicago
KeywordsLungfishHypoxia (environmental)CatecholamineBiologyEndocrinologyInternal medicineCardiorespiratory fitnessHeart rateChemoreceptorBlood pressureChemistryOxygenMedicineFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Circulating catecholamine levels and a variety of cardiorespiratory variables were monitored in cannulated bimodally breathing African lungfish (Protopterus dolloi) exposed to aquatic or aerial hypoxia. Owing to the purported absence of external branchial chemoreceptors in lungfish and the minor role played by the gill in O2 uptake, it was hypothesized that plasma catecholamine levels would increase only during exposure of fish to aerial hypoxia. The rapid induction of aquatic hypoxia (final PWo2 = 25.9+/-1.6 mmHg) did not affect the levels of adrenaline (A) or noradrenaline (NA) within the plasma. Similarly, none of the measured cardiorespiratory variables--including heart rate (fH), blood pressure, air-breathing frequency (fV), O2 consumption (Mo2), CO2 excretion (Mco2), or blood gases--were influenced by acute aquatic hypoxia. In contrast, however, the rapid induction of aerial hypoxia (inspired Po2=46.6+/-3.3 mmHg) caused a marked increase in the circulating levels of A (from 7.9+/-2.0 to 18.8+/-6.1 nmol L(-1)) and NA (from 7.7+/-2.2 to 19.7+/-6.3 nmol L(-1)) that was accompanied by significant decreases in Mo2, arterial Po2 (Pao2), and arterial O2 concentration (Cao2). Air-breathing frequency was increased (by approximately five breaths per hour) during aerial hypoxia and presumably contributed to the observed doubling of pulmonary Mco2 (from 0.25+/-0.04 to 0.49+/-0.07 mmol kg(-1) h(-1)); fH and blood pressure were unaffected by aerial hypoxia. An in situ perfused heart preparation was used to test the possibility that catecholamine secretion from cardiac chromaffin cells was being activated by a direct localized effect of hypoxia. Catecholamine secretion from the chromaffin cells of the heart, while clearly responsive to a depolarizing concentration of KCl (60 mmol L(-1)), was unaffected by the O2 status of the perfusion fluid. The results of this study demonstrate that P. dolloi is able to mobilize stored catecholamines and increase f(V) during exposure to aerial hypoxia while remaining unresponsive to aquatic hypoxia. Thus, unlike in exclusively water-breathing teleosts, P. dolloi would appear to rely solely on internal/airway O2 chemoreceptors for initiating catecholamine secretion and cardiorespiratory responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiological and Biochemical ZoologySame topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsFrench-language works237,207