MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Brain functional reorganization in early blind humans revealed by auditory event-related potentials

2000· article· en· W2025738709 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroreport · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTactile and Sensory Interactions
Canadian institutionsInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de MontréalUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPsychologyAudiologyNeuroscienceScalpSensory systemTask (project management)ElectroencephalographyAuditory perceptionEvent-related potentialPerceptionMedicineAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Visually challenged individuals often compensate for their handicap by developing supra-normal abilities in their remaining sensory systems. Here, we examined the scalp distribution of components N1 and P3 of auditory evoked potentials during a sound localization task in four totally blind subjects who had previously shown better performance than sighted subjects. Both N1 and P3 waves peaked at their usual positions while blind and sighted individuals performed the task. However, in blind subjects these two components were also found to be robust over occipital regions while in sighted individuals this pattern was not seen. We conclude that deafferented posterior visual areas in blind individuals are recruited to carry out auditory functions, enabling these individuals to compensate for their lack of vision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.666
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it