The Touquoy Zone deposit: an example of "unusual" orogenic gold mineralisation in the Meguma Terrane, Nova Scotia, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Touquoy Zone deposit is host to disseminated gold mineralisation in metasiltstones of lower Palaeozoic age. From the close correlation between ore grades and the intersection of favourable stratigraphy and bounding faults, it is apparent that mineralisation is controlled by both structural and lithological influences. Within the ore zone, disseminated gold, arsenopyrite, pyrite, and rare base-metal sulphides are associated with a network of widely spaced, millimetre-scale, quartzcarbonate veinlets. Quasi-pervasive fluid flow and prolonged interaction with the host rocks resulted in a diffuse, but pronounced halo of wall-rock alteration that is characterized by the breakdown of detrital feldspar and metamorphic chlorite and the development of hydrothermal carbonate phases, K-mica, and disseminated sulphides. These mineralogical changes are accompanied by enrichment in CO2, K, Au, As, and S and depletion in Na across the ore zone. Vein formation occurred at between 250° and 350°C and pressures of less than 12 kbar (1 kbar = 100 MPa), corresponding to an estimated depth of between <2.8 and 6 km. Mineralisation resulted from the unmixing of an overpressured (low-salinity, CO2-rich) fluid in response to decreasing pressure during its ascent and penetration into permeable host rocks. Geological and geochemical features of mineralisation in the Touquoy Zone deposit are seen as convincing evidence for a close genetic association between disseminated-style and lode gold mineralisation in orogenic terrains, with the resulting style of mineralisation largely controlled by the overall structural geometry of the mineralising site, rheological properties, permeability and chemical receptiveness of the host rock, and structural level of emplacement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".