Lithium Halide Adducts of Imidotellurium(IV) Ligands: Synthesis and X-ray Structures of [Li(THF)<sub>2</sub>L](μ<sub>3</sub>-I)[LiI(L)] [L = <i><sup>t</sup></i>BuNTe(μ-N<i><sup>t</sup></i>Bu)<sub>2</sub>TeN<i><sup>t</sup></i>Bu] and [(THF)<sub>3</sub>Li<sub>3</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-I){Te(N<i><sup>t</sup></i>Bu)<sub>3</sub>}]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reaction of the chelating ligand tBuNTe(mu-NtBu)2TeNtBu (L) with LiI in THF yields [Li(THF)2L](mu 3-I)[LiI(L)] (3). This complex is also formed by the attempted oxidation of [Li2Te(NtBu)3]2 with I2. An X-ray analysis of 3 reveals that the tellurium diimide dimer acts as a chelating ligand toward (a) [Li(THF)2]+ cations and (b) a molecule of LiI. An extended structure is formed via weak Te...I interactions [3.8296(7)-3.9632(7) A] involving both mu 3-iodide counterions and the iodine atoms of the coordinated LiI molecules. Crystal data: 3, triclinic, space group P1, a = 10.1233(9) A, b = 15.7234(14) A, c = 18.8962(17) A, alpha = 86.1567(16) degrees, beta = 84.3266(16) degrees, gamma = 82.9461(16) degrees, V = 2965.8(5) A3, Z = 2. The oxidation by air of [Li2Te(NtBu)3]2 in toluene produces the radical (Li3[Te(NtBu)3]2), which exhibits an ESR spectrum consisting of a septet of decuplets (g = 2.00506, a(14N) = 5.26 G, a(7Li) = 0.69 G). The complexes [(THF)3Li3(mu 3-X)(Te(NtBu)3)] (4a, X = Cl; 4b, X = Br; 4c, X = I) are obtained from the reaction of [Li2Te(NtBu)3]2 with lithium halides in THF. The iodide complex, 4c, has a highly distorted, cubic structure comprised of the pyramidal [Te(NtBu)3]2- dianion which is linked through three [Li(THF)]+ cations to I- Crystal data: 4c, triclinic, space group P1, a = 12.611(8) A, b = 16.295(6) A, c = 10.180(3) A, alpha = 98.35(3) degrees, beta = 107.37(4) degrees, gamma = 108.26(4) degrees, V = 1829(2) A3, Z = 2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".