MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025774160 · doi:10.1067/mhn.2001.113036

Skin Metastases in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

2001· article· en· W2025774160 on OpenAlexaff
Adi Yoskovitch, Michael Hier, Allan Okrainec, Martin J. Black, Louise Rochon

Bibliographic record

VenueOtolaryngology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStage (stratigraphy)OncologyInternal medicineHead and neckDemographicsMetastasisDistant metastasisPrimary tumorRadiologyCancerSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: Distant metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) are most often to the lung, liver, and bone. SCCHN rarely metastasizes to skin sites. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the significance of skin metastases (SM) on the prognosis of patients with SCCHN. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients between 1987 and 1999 with SCCHN was conducted. Patients in whom SM developed were identified. Data pertaining to demographics, primary tumor staging, SM development, and outcome were investigated. RESULTS: In 798 consecutive patients diagnosed with SCCHN between 1987 and 2000, 19 developed SM. The average time of onset of the SM was 17.65 months. The average survival time was 7.2 months after the development of SM. The overall survival time of patients who developed SM from the initial presentation of the primary tumor was 24.85 months. The 1-year survival rate from the time of development of SM was 0%. CONCLUSIONS: Metastasis to skin sites is an uncommon feature of SCCHN. SM may represent the first clinical evidence of impending loco-regional recurrence or distant metastasis. The development of SM is an ominous sign associated with an extremely poor prognosis, similar to the development of distant metastasis at more typical sites. Both the development of SM and survival of patients developing SM are independent of primary tumor stage. Current treatment options of SM are limited in their efficacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.224

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOtolaryngologySame topicHead and Neck Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207