MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025808666 · doi:10.1021/ef400897e

Ethanol Dehydration in a Pressure Swing Adsorption Process Using Canola Meal

2013· article· en· W2025808666 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFreezing and Crystallization Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCanolaAdsorptionMass transferChemistryDehydrationChromatographyMealEthanolChemical engineeringAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Organic chemistryFood scienceBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canola meal was used as an adsorbent in a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) process for ethanol dehydration at different temperatures, vapor feed concentrations, and adsorbent particle sizes. Adsorption experiments were performed at breakthrough point and equilibrium. The results demonstrate that canola meal was able to break the ethanol–water azeotropic point 95.6 wt %, selectively adsorb water, and produce over 99 wt % pure ethanol. At elevated temperature and feedwater concentration, water mass transfer rate increased. In addition, the mass transfer rate decreased when the size of the adsorbent particles was increased. The water breakthrough curves were simulated by incorporating the Linear Driving Force model and the mass transfer resistances were evaluated. The internal mass transfer resistance was identified as the mass transfer limit. The water-saturated canola meal was regenerated at temperatures no higher than 110 °C under vacuum and successfully reused.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.148
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it