MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025871272 · doi:10.3917/ahdlm.072.0147

Hermes Trismegistus in Thomas of York: A 13th-century Witness to the Prominence of an Ancient Sage

2005· article· fr· W2025871272 on OpenAlexaff
David Porreca

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives d histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWitnessHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé L’œuvre principale de Thomas d’York, le Sapientiale , témoigne de l’apogée de l’influence des textes attribués à Hermès Trismégiste au Moyen Âge. Thomas avait une très bonne connaissance et une révérence particulière pour l’ Asclepius et le Liber de VI rerum principiis . Le développement de sa conception des propriétés de Dieu et des liens entre le monde divin et la création en porte l’empreinte. L’article propose également l’édition des passages de ses ouvrages qui comportent des citations d’Hermès Trismégiste.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.019
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives d histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen ÂgeSame topicHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical StudiesFrench-language works237,207