MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025932907 · doi:10.1080/13561820600556182

The evidence base and recommendations for interprofessional education in health and social care

2006· article· en· W2025932907 on OpenAlexaff
Hugh Barr, Della Freeth, Marilyn Hammick, Ivan Koppel, Scott Reeves

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Interprofessional Care · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoThe Wilson Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterprofessional educationSocial careHealth careNursingSocial workPsychologyBase (topology)MedicineMedical educationPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a summary of findings from a Systematic Review reported in:Barr, H., Koppel, I., Reeves, S., Hammick, M., & Freeth. D. (2005). Effective Interprofessional Education: Argument, Assumption an...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.105
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.344
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.555

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1050.344
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.015
Bibliometrics0.0220.018
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0110.010
Open science0.0090.006
Research integrity0.0140.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.492
Teacher spread0.455 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations108
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Interprofessional CareSame topicInterprofessional Education and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207