MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025964717 · doi:10.4021/jmc.v4i7.1199

Rapid Remission of a Second Primary Kaposi’s Sarcoma With Thalidomide Treatment in a Patient Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colon Cancer

2013· article· en· W2025964717 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chih‐Ming Chou, Kuei-Fang Chou, Wei‐Yu Chen, En-Kwang Lin, Yi-Fang Chang, Ying‐Wen Su

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral-associated cancers and disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSarcomaChemotherapyThalidomideMalignancyOncologyInternal medicineCancerAdjuvantColorectal cancerRadiation therapyPathologyMultiple myeloma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kaposi’s sarcoma is a human herpes virus 8 associated-angioproliferative disorder, which is commonly associated with immunocompromised conditions such as those which arise in renal transplant recipients, or in acquired immune-deficiency syndrome (AIDS) cases. It is less well described, however, in patients with solid tumors undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. We report the case of an HIV-negative heterosexual Taiwanese man who developed a second primary Kaposi’s sarcoma 5 months after the start of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer. Thalidomide treatment was started after the patient completed 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy, and the Kaposi’s sarcoma regressed within 2 months. The case reported here suggests that pre-existing HHV-8 infection and adjuvant chemotherapy may predispose these patients to a second malignancy with Kaposi’s sarcoma. Restoration of immune function through cessation of chemotherapy and thalidomide administration may accelerate the regression of the disease, thereby avoiding the need for radiotherapy or anthracycline-based chemotherapy. J Med Cases. 2013;4(7):466-470 doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/jmc1199w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicViral-associated cancers and disordersFrench-language works237,207