MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026021229 · doi:10.1139/y01-064

β-Cyclodextrin inhibits the sweet taste suppressing activity of gurmarin by the formation of an inclusion complex with aromatic residues in gurmarin

2001· article· en· W2026021229 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Toshiaki Imoto, Kazushige Sasamoto, Yuzo Ninomiya

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistrySize-exclusion chromatographyCyclodextrinTyrosineElutionAbsorption (acoustics)ChromatographyTryptophanTasteBeta-CyclodextrinsHydrophobic effectAmino acidStereochemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our recent study in mice revealed that the inhibitory activity of gurmarin on the sweet taste responses was reduced significantly by the presence of beta-cyclodextrin (beta-CD). To investigate the mechanism involved in the action of beta-CD, physicochemical experiments were performed on the interaction of CDs with gurmarin examining the effect of CDs on the UV absorption spectrum of gurmarin and on the elution behavior in gel filtration (or exclusion) chromatography. Among the three kinds of cyclodextrins tested, beta-CD induced significant changes in the UV absorption spectrum of gurmarin that were characteristic of those found in the inclusion complex formation of tyrosine and tryptophan with beta-CD. The abnormal retention behavior of gurmarin in gel filtration resulting from hydrophobic interaction with the gel matrix reverted to normal in the presence of beta-CD in the elution buffer. These results suggest that the unique domain of gurmarin, in which five aromatic amino acid residues are all directed outwardly and form a hydrophobic cluster, is a possible site of interaction with the gurmarin-sensitive sweet taste receptor molecules in rodents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.569

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologySame topicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207