β-Cyclodextrin inhibits the sweet taste suppressing activity of gurmarin by the formation of an inclusion complex with aromatic residues in gurmarin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our recent study in mice revealed that the inhibitory activity of gurmarin on the sweet taste responses was reduced significantly by the presence of beta-cyclodextrin (beta-CD). To investigate the mechanism involved in the action of beta-CD, physicochemical experiments were performed on the interaction of CDs with gurmarin examining the effect of CDs on the UV absorption spectrum of gurmarin and on the elution behavior in gel filtration (or exclusion) chromatography. Among the three kinds of cyclodextrins tested, beta-CD induced significant changes in the UV absorption spectrum of gurmarin that were characteristic of those found in the inclusion complex formation of tyrosine and tryptophan with beta-CD. The abnormal retention behavior of gurmarin in gel filtration resulting from hydrophobic interaction with the gel matrix reverted to normal in the presence of beta-CD in the elution buffer. These results suggest that the unique domain of gurmarin, in which five aromatic amino acid residues are all directed outwardly and form a hydrophobic cluster, is a possible site of interaction with the gurmarin-sensitive sweet taste receptor molecules in rodents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".