Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis les premières années de la Monarchie de Juillet jusqu’aux avant-gardes fin-de-siècle, la poésie a dû trouver un asile précaire dans les journaux parisiens et dans la petite presse littéraire. Or, le support médiatique n’offre pas seulement aux poètes un mode de diffusion conforme aux attentes culturelles de l’époque, mais il marque de son empreinte particulière et reconnaissable l’esthétique de la littérature post-romantique, l’infléchissant dans une direction qui aurait été inimaginable sans lui, la « modernité ». Telle est l’hypothèse que cet article se propose d’étayer, grâce à l’étude exhaustive de toutes les prépublications en périodiques des futurs poèmes des Fleurs du mal de Baudelaire. Cette étude permettra de tirer un double enseignement. Sur le plan diachronique, elle changera sensiblement la physionomie et le sens de l’oeuvre baudelairienne, l’inscrivant dans une dynamique historique et collective qui fait évidemment défaut aux recueils de 1857 et de 1861.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".