MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026050615 · doi:10.1038/ng.3144

A recurrent de novo mutation in KCNC1 causes progressive myoclonus epilepsy

2014· article· en· W2026050615 on OpenAlexaff
Mikko Muona, Samuel F. Berkovic, Leanne M. Dibbens, Karen Oliver, Snezana Maljevic, Marta A. Bayly, Tarja Joensuu, Laura Canafoglia, Silvana Franceschetti, Roberto Michelucci, Salla Markkinen, Sarah E. Heron, Michael S. Hildebrand, Eva Andermann, Frédérick Andermann, Antonio Gambardella, Paolo Tinuper, Laura Licchetta, Ingrid E. Scheffer, Chiara Criscuolo, Alessandro Filla, Edoardo Ferlazzo, Jamil Ahmad, Adeel Ahmad, Betül Baykan, Edith Said, Meral Topçu, P. Riguzzi, Mary D. King, Çiğdem Özkara, Danielle M. Andrade, Bernt A. Engelsen, Arielle Crespel, Matthias Lindenau, Ebba Lohmann, Veronica Saletti, João Massano, Michael Privitera, Alberto J. Espay, Michael Duchowny, Rikke S. Møller, Rachel Straussberg, Zaid Afawi, Bruria Ben‐Zeev, Kaitlin E. Samocha, Mark J. Daly, Steven Petrou, Holger Lerche, Aarno Palotie, Anna-Elina Lehesjoki

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Genetics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcGill UniversityToronto Western HospitalMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersWellcome Trust
KeywordsBiologyProgressive myoclonus epilepsyEpilepsyMutationGeneticsMyoclonusNeuroscienceGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations315
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature GeneticsSame topicGlycogen Storage Diseases and MyoclonusFrench-language works237,207