MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026055803 · doi:10.1002/eco.244

Contributions of streamflow variability, concentration–discharge shifts and forested wetlands to terrestrial–aquatic solute export in Precambrian Shield headwater catchments

2011· article· en· W2026055803 on OpenAlexaff
Murray Richardson

Bibliographic record

VenueEcohydrology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWetlandBiogeochemical cycleEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)Surface runoffFlux (metallurgy)WatershedTerrestrial ecosystemCarbon cycleStreamflowDrainage basinEcologyEcosystemGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Hydrological and biogeochemical processes in terrestrial watershed compartments are an important source of short‐ and long‐term physico‐chemical dynamics in Precambrian Shield headwater lakes. In this study, a residual analysis of concentration discharge models based on the composite method of stream solute flux estimation was conducted to quantify two key factors contributing to terrestrial–aquatic export of sulphate (SO 4 2− ), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), hydronium ion (H + ) and colour for ten Precambrian Shield catchments in three lake basins: (1) advective transport capacity, as influenced by variations in runoff, and (2) the terrestrial supply of mobilizable solute, as influenced by terrestrial biogeochemical cycling and associated controlling variables. Overall, annual fluxes associated with mechanism (2) were approximately equal to those associated with mechanism (1) in driving inter‐annual deviations from long‐term mean annual solute export. There was considerable variation in the relative contributions of these mechanisms among solutes and watersheds, and % wetland area could not explain these differences. However, mean annual terrestrial‐aquatic fluxes of DOC and colour were highly correlated with % wetland area, as were inter‐annual variations in mean annual flux. The corresponding relationships between H + and % wetland area were moderate but also significant. Annual fluxes SO 4 2− were negatively associated with wetlands but there was no relationship between inter‐annual variations in mean annual SO 4 2− flux and % wetland area. The contribution of forested wetlands to annual flux variability for DOC, colour and H + was primarily driven by inter‐annual differences in runoff and associated mobilization of large solute pools within these critical source areas of organic carbon and acidity. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcohydrologySame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207