MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026115452 · doi:10.1063/1.2162989

X-ray-diffraction study of crystalline Si nanocluster formation in annealed silicon-rich silicon oxides

2006· article· en· W2026115452 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersOntario Centres of Excellence
KeywordsNanoclustersSiliconAnnealing (glass)Materials sciencePlasma-enhanced chemical vapor depositionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Amorphous solidTransmission electron microscopyChemical vapor depositionAmorphous siliconCrystallographyCrystalline siliconChemistryNanotechnologyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The formation and subsequent growth of crystalline silicon nanoclusters (Si-ncs) in annealed silicon-rich silicon oxides (SRSOs) were studied by glancing angle x-ray diffraction. SRSO samples with Si concentrations (y) of 0.40, 0.42, and 0.45 were grown by inductively coupled plasma-enhanced chemical-vapor deposition (PECVD). Samples with y=0.42 grown by electron-cyclotron-resonance PECVD were also studied. Annealing treatments were performed at temperatures (T) of 900, 1000, and 1100 °C for times (t) between 0.5 and 3 h in flowing Ar. As-grown SRSO films did not present signs of Si clusters (amorphous or crystalline); however, (111), (220), and (311) Bragg peaks corresponding to c-Si were clearly seen after annealing at 900 °C for the y=0.45 sample, but only barely seen for the y=0.42 and undetected for the y=0.40 samples. For T=1000°C, all studied SRSO samples clearly showed the c-Si diffraction peaks, which became narrower with increasing t and T. From the width of the Si (111) peaks, the mean size of Si-ncs and their dependence on T and t was determined. Activation energies were deduced from the T dependence by fitting the results to two growth models of Si precipitates in an a-SiO2 matrix reported in the literature. The activation energies qualitatively agree with values deduced from transmission electron microscopy studies of annealed SRSO reported in the literature. However, they are significantly lower than Si diffusion activation energies available in the literature for SiO2 with low excess Si. A broad feature is also observed in the x-ray diffractograms for as-grown samples with low y, which shifts to the peak position corresponding to a-SiO2 with increasing T. This behavior is explained by the formation of a well-defined a-SiO2 phase with increasing T, where mixed Si–O4−nSin (n=1,2,3) tetrahedra in the as-grown alloy are gradually converted into Si–O4 and Si–Si4 as phase separation of Si and SiO2 proceeds. From the measured Si (111) peak positions, small Si-ncs are found to be tensilely strained by as much as ∼0.8%. This effect becomes insignificant as Si-ncs become larger with increasing y or T.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it