MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026127875 · doi:10.1115/1.4026814

Modeling of Thermomagnetic Phenomena in Active Magnetocaloric Regenerators

2014· article· en· W2026127875 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegenerative heat exchangerMagnetic refrigerationMaterials scienceThermomagnetic convectionHeat transferRefrigerantThermodynamicsPorous mediumHeat exchangerMagnetic fieldMechanicsPorosityComposite materialMagnetizationPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The active magnetic regenerator (AMR) consists of a porous matrix heat exchanger whose solid phase is a magnetocaloric material (solid refrigerant) that undergoes a reversible magnetic entropy change when subjected to a changing magnetic field. The cooling capacity of the cycle is proportional to the mass of solid refrigerant, operating frequency, volumetric displacement of the heat transfer fluid and regenerator effectiveness. AMRs can be modeled via a porous media approach and a model has been developed in this work to simulate the time-dependent fluid flow and heat transfer processes in the regenerator matrix. Gadolinium (Gd) is usually adopted as a reference material for magnetic cooling at near room temperature and its magnetic temperature change and physical properties were accounted for through a combination of experimental data and the Weiss-Debye-Sommerfeld (WDS) theory. In this paper, the interaction of the applied magnetic field waveform with the heat transfer fluid displacement profile and the influence of demagnetizing effects on the AMR performance are investigated numerically. The numerical model is evaluated against experimental data for a regenerator containing spherical Gd particles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it