<b>Reflexões sobre a avaliação da aprendizagem: diversidade e inclusão escolar</b>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/4085Este artigo teve como objetivo analisar as concepções e instrumentos de avaliação escolar por meio dos dizeres de professores do sétimo ano do Ensino Fundamental de uma escola municipal de Bombinhas/SC, sob a óptica teórica dos princípios da inclusão e avaliação escolar, nas resoluções mais recentes do MEC sobre diversidade e nas contribuições de Vygotsky. Optamos pela pesquisa qualitativa e como coleta de dados utilizamos a entrevista semiestruturada. Para nortear a interpretação dos dizeres, utilizamos a análise de conteúdo. Compreendemos que os professores tendem a modificar pouco suas estratégias e métodos de ensino, procurando avaliar a todos de maneira igual, tornando assim comprometido a abrangência das diferenças na escola. Palavras-chave: Avaliação da aprendizagem; Inclusão escolar; Pesquisa qualitativa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.025 | 0.036 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".