MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026160835 · doi:10.4296/cwrj2011-938

The Effects of Climate Change on Extreme Precipitation Events in the Upper Thames River Basin: A Comparison of Downscaling Approaches

2012· article· en· W2026160835 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Leanna M. King, Sarah Irwin, Rubaiya Sarwar, A. Ian McLeod, Slobodan P. Simonović

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCanadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
KeywordsDownscalingEnvironmental sciencePrecipitationClimatologyClimate changeGreenhouse gasClimate modelMeteorologyGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Future changes in climatic conditions from increasing greenhouse gas concentrations will have a major impact on the hydrologic cycle. It is important to understand and predict future changes in temperature and precipitation in order to effectively manage water resources. Atmosphere-Ocean coupled Global Climate Models (AOGCMs) are used widely to predict the effects of greenhouse-gas forcing on global climate conditions. However, their spatial and temporal resolutions are quite large so their outputs must be modified to represent local climate conditions. This process is called downscaling, and there are a variety of tools available to achieve this goal. This study compares three downscaling approaches, namely the Statistical DownScaling Model (SDSM), Long Ashton Research Station Weather Generator (LARS-WG), and the K-NN Weather Generator with Principal Component Analysis (WG-PCA). Each weather generator is used to simulate the historical climate for the Upper Thames River Basin in Ontario, Canada for use in a comparison of downscaling tools. Future climate conditions are simulated by LARS-WG and WG-PCA from six different AOGCMs, each with two to three emissions scenarios, for a total of 15 different models. In simulation of historical climate variability, the models generally perform better in terms of mean daily precipitation and total monthly precipitation. LARS-WG simulates precipitation events well but cannot reproduce means and variances in the daily temperature series. SDSM adequately simulates both temperatures and precipitation events. WG-PCA reproduces daily temperatures very well but overestimates the occurrence of some extreme precipitation events. Results are variable for the downscaling of AOGCMs; however, the downscaling tools generally predict a rise in winter, spring and fall precipitation totals, as well as an overall increase in mean annual precipitation in future decades.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2012
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriquesSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207