MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026163322 · doi:10.1021/bi011383w

Physical Properties of Human Polynucleotide Kinase:  Hydrodynamic and Spectroscopic Studies

2001· article· en· W2026163322 on OpenAlexaff
Rajam S. Mani, Feridoun Karimi‐Busheri, Carol E. Cass, Michael Weinfeld

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomotetramerSedimentation coefficientCircular dichroismPolynucleotideSedimentation equilibriumStokes radiusUltracentrifugeComplementary DNAProtein secondary structureBiochemistryMonomerChemistryEnzymeProtein structureCrystallographyBiologyMolecular biologyPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human polynucleotide kinase (hPNK) is a putative DNA repair enzyme in the base excision repair pathway required for processing and rejoining strand-break termini. This study represents the first systematic examination of the physical properties of this enzyme. The protein was produced in Escherichia coli as a His-tagged protein, and the purified recombinant protein exhibited both the kinase and the phosphatase activities. The predicted relative molecular mass (M(r)) of the 521 amino acid polypeptide encoded by the sequenced cDNA for PNK and the additional 21 amino acids of the His tag is 59,538. The M(r) determined by low-speed sedimentation equilibrium under nondenaturing conditions was 59,600 +/- 1000, indicating that the protein exists as a monomer, in contrast to T4 phage PNK, which exists as a homotetramer. The size and shape of hPNK in solution were determined by analytical ultracentrifugation studies. The protein was found to have an intrinsic sedimentation coefficient, s(0)(20,w), of 3.54 S and a Stokes radius, R(s), of 37.5 A. These hydrodynamic data, together with the M(r) of 59 600, suggest that hPNK is a moderately asymmetric protein with an axial ratio of 5.51. Analysis of the secondary structure of hPNK on the basis of circular dichroism spectra, which revealed the presence of two negative dichroic bands located at 218 and 209 nm, with ellipticity values of -7200 +/- 300 and -7800 +/- 300 deg x cm(2) x d(mol(-1), respectively, indicated the presence of approximately 50% beta-structure and 25% alpha-helix. Binding of ATP to the protein induced an increase in beta-structure and perturbed tryptophan, tyrosine, and phenylalanine signals observed by aromatic CD and UV difference spectroscopy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207