MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026174573 · doi:10.1145/1631024.1631031

Ice hockey shot event modeling with mixture hidden Markov model

2009· article· en· W2026174573 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaofeng Wang, Xiao–Ping Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Analysis and Summarization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHidden Markov modelIce hockeyComputer scienceEvent (particle physics)Mixture modelShot (pellet)Artificial intelligenceFrame (networking)Pattern recognition (psychology)Speech recognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we present a new event analysis framework based on mixture Hidden Markov Model(HMM) for ice hockey video. Hockey is a competitive sport, which is hard to model because of its frame color homogeneity. But it does posses many temporal regularities. With the mixture representation of local observations and Markov chain property of hockey event structure the hockey shot event is successfully modeled as a mixture HMM. Based on the mixture HMM the hockey shot event could be classified with higher accuracy. Two kinds of mixture HMM are compared for the real hockey video shot event classification. The results prove our analysis that the mixture HMM is a suitable model to deal with complex videos with intensive activities. The new mixture HMM hockey shot event model could be a very useful tool for coaches and players to analyze hockey games.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Analysis and SummarizationFrench-language works237,207