MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

LATEST SYSTEM DEVELOPMENTS FOR A TIDAL LIQUID VENTILATOR

2006· article· en· W2026189462 on OpenAlexaffabout
R. Robert, Philippe Micheau, Jean‐Paul Praud, H Walti

Bibliographic record

VenueASAIO Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondenser (optics)Heat exchangerVolume (thermodynamics)Piston pumpVapoursPiston (optics)Mechanical engineeringMaterials scienceMechanicsGas compressorEngineeringThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diverse types of tidal liquid ventilators have been developed for conducting animal experiments. Regardless of the technologies used, a liquid ventilator must perform the following essential functions: insert and withdraw the tidal volume of perfluorochemical liquid (PFC) from the lungs, oxygenate and maintain the PFC at a desired temperature. The latest system developments on the Inolivent prototype are described. For its simplicity and low cost, a bubble gas exchanger was built. It is divided into two sections such that the PFC exiting the lungs is not in contact with the PFC entering the lungs. The equivalent gas exchange area is around 0.8m2 for two oxygenators in series, which is equivalent to an ECMO for children less than 10kg. The heating system is incorporated in the metallic base of the gas exchanger, and a heat sink-type condenser is placed on top of the exchanger to retrieve PFC vapours. Its efficiency is 75%, yielding a net PFOB loss of about 21ml/h, using perfluorooctylbromide. This condenser-heater-oxygenator configuration minimizes the priming volume and simplifies the assembly. This unit is also modular and can be easily adapted for an adult patient. In order to insert and withdraw PFC liquid from the lung, two independent piston pumps are volume controlled and pressure limited. The latter produces steady flows, although the main interest of a piston pump is to achieve perfect volume-controlled ventilation. Measurable pumping errors are corrected by a programmed supervisor module, which modifies the inserted or withdrawn volume. Pump independence also permits easy FRC modifications during ventilation, without altering the ventilation scheme. Different cycles are available on the ventilator. A preparation cycle allows the movement of the liquid in a closed loop to warm and oxygenate the PFC. A filling sequence serves to fill the patient's lungs using one pump. Finally, the respiratory cycle is used to carry out TLV. All of those cycles and their adjustable parameters are accessible and can be changed via a human-ventilator interface. The Inolivent tidal liquid ventilator was tested on 8 healthy newborn lambs. The results demonstrate the efficiency and safety of the prototype in maintaining adequate gas exchange, normal acido-basis equilibrium, and cardiovascular stability during a short 2 hours TLV. The team is supported in part by the Foundation for Research into Children's Diseases and by the Fonds Québécois pour la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASAIO JournalSame topicProcess Optimization and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207