MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

LATEST SYSTEM DEVELOPMENTS FOR A TIDAL LIQUID VENTILATOR

2006· article· en· W2026189462 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueASAIO Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondenser (optics)Heat exchangerVolume (thermodynamics)Piston pumpVapoursPiston (optics)Mechanical engineeringMaterials scienceMechanicsGas compressorEngineeringThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diverse types of tidal liquid ventilators have been developed for conducting animal experiments. Regardless of the technologies used, a liquid ventilator must perform the following essential functions: insert and withdraw the tidal volume of perfluorochemical liquid (PFC) from the lungs, oxygenate and maintain the PFC at a desired temperature. The latest system developments on the Inolivent prototype are described. For its simplicity and low cost, a bubble gas exchanger was built. It is divided into two sections such that the PFC exiting the lungs is not in contact with the PFC entering the lungs. The equivalent gas exchange area is around 0.8m2 for two oxygenators in series, which is equivalent to an ECMO for children less than 10kg. The heating system is incorporated in the metallic base of the gas exchanger, and a heat sink-type condenser is placed on top of the exchanger to retrieve PFC vapours. Its efficiency is 75%, yielding a net PFOB loss of about 21ml/h, using perfluorooctylbromide. This condenser-heater-oxygenator configuration minimizes the priming volume and simplifies the assembly. This unit is also modular and can be easily adapted for an adult patient. In order to insert and withdraw PFC liquid from the lung, two independent piston pumps are volume controlled and pressure limited. The latter produces steady flows, although the main interest of a piston pump is to achieve perfect volume-controlled ventilation. Measurable pumping errors are corrected by a programmed supervisor module, which modifies the inserted or withdrawn volume. Pump independence also permits easy FRC modifications during ventilation, without altering the ventilation scheme. Different cycles are available on the ventilator. A preparation cycle allows the movement of the liquid in a closed loop to warm and oxygenate the PFC. A filling sequence serves to fill the patient's lungs using one pump. Finally, the respiratory cycle is used to carry out TLV. All of those cycles and their adjustable parameters are accessible and can be changed via a human-ventilator interface. The Inolivent tidal liquid ventilator was tested on 8 healthy newborn lambs. The results demonstrate the efficiency and safety of the prototype in maintaining adequate gas exchange, normal acido-basis equilibrium, and cardiovascular stability during a short 2 hours TLV. The team is supported in part by the Foundation for Research into Children's Diseases and by the Fonds Québécois pour la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it