MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026204325 · doi:10.1243/09544062jmes1839

An improved fuzzy programming model with an L—R fuzzy number for filter management strategies in fluid power systems under uncertainty

2010· article· en· W2026204325 on OpenAlexaff
Songlin Nie, Zibo Xiong, Yongping Li, Guohe Huang, Zhen Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFuzzy logicRobustness (evolution)LinearizationControl theory (sociology)Mathematical optimizationFilter (signal processing)Computer scienceFuzzy control systemNonlinear systemMathematicsControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A fuzzy non-linear programming model is developed for the assessment of filter allocation and replacement strategies in fluid power systems (FPSs) under uncertainty. It can not only handle uncertainties expressed as L—R fuzzy numbers, but also enhance the system robustness by transforming the fuzzy inequalities into inclusive constraints. In modelling formulation, theory of contamination wear is introduced to reflect the interactions between system performance and system contamination level. The developed method has been applied to the planning of filter allocation and replacement for an FPS with a bypass filtration system, and a piecewise linearization approach is proposed for solving model non-linearities. Three different contaminant ingression rates are examined based on a number of filter-installation scenarios. The generated solutions can be used for providing guidance to decision makers to identify better contamination control plans for achieving a minimized system cost and system-failure risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.511
Threshold uncertainty score0.788

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering ScienceSame topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207