MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026207260 · doi:10.4043/25474-ms

Design and Development of a Greenland Ice and Metocean Geoportal

2015· article· en· W2026207260 on OpenAlexaff
Ed Ross, Eduardo Loos, David B. Fissel, Y. Lapidakis, O. Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueOTC Arctic Technology Conference · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicModel-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
Canadian institutionsASL Environmental Sciences (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeoportalBathymetryComputer scienceRemote sensingOceanographyGeographyGeospatial analysisGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Completed and planned metocean and ice measurement programs off Greenland's eastern and western coasts result in large and varied datasets characterizing physical phenomena such as icebergs, sea ice, seabed scours, weather, surface waves, ocean currents, and water properties. Future planned measurement programs will expand on the spatial and temporal breadth of these datasets. Other datasets support the analysis of the measurement data including license area locations, bathymetry, glacier calving areas, and notable submarine features. In order to plan measurement programs, manage the acquired datasets, and use the data for characterization of the physical environment, a web-based geoportal was designed and developed. The geoportal aids scientists and engineers in their discovery and use of metocean and ice data. The geoportal development required balancing two aspects. Firstly, scientists and engineers have extensive needs to upload, organize, search, visualize, analyze, and download large and varied datasets. Secondly, there are inherent limitations of web technologies due to bandwidth, latency, and security constraints. Many design decisions were focused on balancing these issues and are presented here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOTC Arctic Technology ConferenceSame topicModel-Driven Software Engineering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207