MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026208021 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2012.6334885

Parameter identification of thermal models for domestic electric water heaters in a direct load control program

2012· article· en· W2026208021 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Shaad, Ahmad Momeni, Chris Diduch, Mary E. Kaye, Liuchen Chang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsWater heaterThermalElectric heatingIdentification (biology)Temperature controlWater consumptionPower (physics)Water heatingControl (management)Computer scienceElectric powerHeating elementTemperature measurementEnvironmental scienceAutomotive engineeringControl engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineeringEnvironmental engineeringMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates an approach for identification of physical models of domestic electric water heaters (DEWH's) that are used to provide aggregated regulation services. The model is used within a direct load control (DLC) algorithm to estimate and forecast the water usage and temperature of individual water heaters. Individual physical models are used instead of aggregated models to allow the DLC algorithm to minimize the impact on customers by customizing the control of each water heater to individual water usage patterns. A single-zone lumped-parameter thermal model was considered for a single element DEWH. Two scenarios are investigated: i) when measurements of water temperature and heater power consumption are available, and ii) when measurements of only heater power consumption are available. The problem is challenging because water usage patterns cannot be measured directly and are governed by the behaviour of individual customers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207