MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2026217730 · doi:10.1118/1.3613026

MO‐F‐110‐04: Experimental Validation of a Novel Approach to Fast and Accurate Kilovoltage Dose Computation

2011· article· en· W2026217730 on OpenAlexaff
Yannick Poirier, Mauro Tambasco, Alexei Kouznetsov

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImaging phantomHomogeneousDose profileIonization chamberComputed radiographyBeam (structure)Nuclear medicineMedical imagingMaterials scienceRadiographyPhysicsOpticsComputer scienceMedicineImage qualityNuclear physicsImage (mathematics)IonizationArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose:To validate a novel hybrid method for the calculation of kilovoltage (kV) x‐ray dose. Methods: We performed experimental validation of a novel hybrid approach for calculating dose deposited by imaging beams (<150 kVp). The approach involves computing the primary photon component deterministically and scattered component stochastically, accounting for the real micro cross sections of the materials involved. Depth dose and profile measurements for the Varian® On‐Board Imaging® unit in the radiographic mode using a 125 kVp x‐ray beam (4.6 mm Al half‐value layer) were performed. The measurements were made using a Farmer‐type Capintec ion chamber (0.06cc) in homogeneous and heterogeneous phantoms. A phantom consisting of Certified Therapy‐Grade Solid Water® (Gammex 457) was used to measure the dose under homogeneous conditions. The heterogeneous phantom was constructed using lung‐ equivalent material (Gammex 455) and bone‐equivalent material (Gammex 450). Results: Measurements in the homogeneous phantom agreed with theoretical calculations within 2% for depth doses and within 2% of the central axis dose for profiles. Local agreement in highly attenuated regions such as depths >10 cm or outside the beam edge were about 10%. However, the dose differences in these regions were less than 2% of the maximum dose. Conclusions: This work provides experimental validation of our hybrid calculation method. The next step will be to test the algorithm using more complex phantoms, such as the anthropomorphic Rando® phantom, which mimics patient geometry as well as inhomogeneities. This is a crucial step in the validation of an independent tool to calculate patient dose from kV beams such as cone‐beam CT and brings us closer to our goal of calculating patient‐specific dose from imaging procedures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Physics→Same topicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques→French-language works237,207→