Tetrodotoxin-, dihydropyridine-, and riluzole-resistant persistent inward current: novel sodium channels in rodent spinal neurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, we reported the tetrodotoxin (TTX)- and dihydropyridine (DHP)-resistant (TDR) inward currents in neonatal mouse spinal neurons. In this study, we further characterized these currents in the presence of 1-5 μM TTX and 20-30 μM DHP (nifedipine, nimodipine, or isradipine). TDR inward currents were recorded by voltage ramp (persistent inward current, TDR-PIC) and step (TDR-I(p)) protocols. TDR-PIC and TDR-I(p) were found in 80.2% of recorded neurons (101/126) crossing laminae I to X from T12 to L6. TDR-PIC activated at -28.6 ± 13 mV with an amplitude of 80.6 ± 75 pA and time constant of 470.6 ± 240 ms (n = 75). TDR-I(p) had an amplitude of 151.2 ± 151 pA and a voltage threshold of -17.0 ± 9 mV (n = 54) with a wide range of kinetics parameters. The half-maximal activation was -21.5 ± 8 mV (-37 to -12 mV, n = 29) with a time constant of 5.2 ± 2 ms (1.2-11.2 ms, n = 19), whereas the half-maximal inactivation was -26.9 ± 9 mV (-39 to -18 mV, n = 14) with a time constant of 1.4 ± 0.4 s (0.5-2.2 s, n = 19). TDR-PIC and TDR-I(p) could be reduced by 60% in zero calcium and completely removed in zero sodium solutions, suggesting that they were mediated by sodium ions. Furthermore, the reversal potential of TDR-I(p) was estimated as 56.6 ± 3 mV (n = 10). TDR-PIC and TDR-I(p) persisted in 1-205 μM TTX, 20-100 μM DHP, 3-30 μM riluzole, 50-300 μM flufenamic acid, and 2-30 mM intracellular BAPTA. They also persisted with T-, N-, P/Q-, and R-type calcium channel blockers. In conclusion, we demonstrated novel TTX-, DHP-, and riluzole-resistant sodium channels in neonatal rodent spinal neurons. The unique pharmacological and electrophysiological properties would allow these channels to play a functional role in spinal motor system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".