MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026270141 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m403706200

Ku70/Ku80 and DNA-dependent Protein Kinase Catalytic Subunit Modulate RAG-mediated Cleavage

2004· article· en· W2026270141 on OpenAlexaff
Dennis J. Sawchuk, Jorge Mansilla‐Soto, Claudio R. Alarcón, Netai C. Singha, Hanno Langen, Marco E. Bianchi, Susan P. Lees‐Miller, Michel C. Nussenzweig, Patricia Cortés

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
KeywordsKu70Ku80Protein subunitCleavage (geology)Protein kinase AChemistryCell biologyBiologyDNAKinaseDNA damageBiochemistryGeneDNA-binding proteinTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 12/23 rule is a critical step for regulation of V(D)J recombination. To date, only the RAG proteins and high mobility group protein 1 or 2 have been implicated in 12/23 regulation. Through protein fractionation and biochemical experiments, we find that Ku70/Ku80 and DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) modulate RAG-mediated cleavage. Modulation of cleavage by Ku70/80 and DNA-PKcs results in preferential inhibition of 12/12 and 23/23 DNA cleavage, thus increasing 12/23 rule specificity. This observation indicates that DNA repair factors, Ku70/80 and DNA-PKcs, might be present upstream of the DNA cleavage events and not recruited downstream as is currently thought, assigning new nonrepair functions to the DNA-dependent protein kinase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207