MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Blood Volume, Aerobic Power, and Endurance Performance: Potential Ergogenic Effect of Volume Loading

2000· review· en· W2026287204 on OpenAlexaff
Darren E. R. Warburton, Norman Gledhill, H. Arthur Quinney

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Journal of Sport Medicine · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOxygen transportPlasma volumeAerobic capacityVO2 maxBlood volumeAerobic exercisePhysical therapyOxygenCardiologyInternal medicineHeart rateChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Blood volume (BV) and hemoglobin concentration ([Hb]) play important roles in oxygen transport. Manipulation of both BV and [Hb] can markedly affect systemic oxygen transport and maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max). However, the role of BV in oxygen transport and aerobic performance is not well understood. It has recently been postulated that an acute expansion of BV using plasma volume (PV), independent of changes in [Hb], may represent a potential ergogenic property. Therefore, the primary objective of this review was to determine the potential ergogenic properties of volume loading. DATA SOURCES: An extensive research of Medline and Sport-Discus along with cross-referencing was conducted. Articles were included on the basis of their relevancy to the purpose of this review. Only articles published in English were included in the analysis. STUDY SELECTION: All study designs using human participants were reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: A systematic analysis of data regarding the effect of BV on the determination of oxygen transport, aerobic capacity, and endurance performance was conducted. Particular emphasis was given to articles that examined BV as the key independent variable. Articles relevant to the evaluation of the impact of BV on aerobic capacity and endurance performance were reviewed according to the strengths of the individual study designs. RESULTS: Seven investigations evaluated the impact of acute changes in BV, independent of changes in [Hb], on VO2max. Of these investigations, three revealed that acute manipulations of BV result in no change or a slight reduction in VO2max. Three investigations revealed a significant improvement in VO2max after acute PV expansion. One investigation revealed a nonsignificant increase in VO2max after acute PV expansion. Seven investigations evaluated the impact of acute changes in BV, independent of changes in [Hb], on endurance performance: two revealed a significant improvement in endurance performance after acute PV expansion, and five revealed an unchanged or reduced endurance performance after acute PV expansion. The majority of investigations showing an improvement in VO2max and/or endurance performance after acute PV expansion were conducted using untrained individuals. CONCLUSION: Volume loading does not result in an improvement in VO2max and/or endurance performance in endurance athletes. Volume loading in untrained individuals may improve VO2max, but does not bring these individuals to the aerobic capacity of endurance-trained athletes. Also, volume loading generally does not lead to improvement in endurance performance, irrespective of its effects on VO2max.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Journal of Sport MedicineSame topicCardiovascular and exercise physiologyFrench-language works237,207