Blood Volume, Aerobic Power, and Endurance Performance: Potential Ergogenic Effect of Volume Loading
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Blood volume (BV) and hemoglobin concentration ([Hb]) play important roles in oxygen transport. Manipulation of both BV and [Hb] can markedly affect systemic oxygen transport and maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max). However, the role of BV in oxygen transport and aerobic performance is not well understood. It has recently been postulated that an acute expansion of BV using plasma volume (PV), independent of changes in [Hb], may represent a potential ergogenic property. Therefore, the primary objective of this review was to determine the potential ergogenic properties of volume loading. DATA SOURCES: An extensive research of Medline and Sport-Discus along with cross-referencing was conducted. Articles were included on the basis of their relevancy to the purpose of this review. Only articles published in English were included in the analysis. STUDY SELECTION: All study designs using human participants were reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: A systematic analysis of data regarding the effect of BV on the determination of oxygen transport, aerobic capacity, and endurance performance was conducted. Particular emphasis was given to articles that examined BV as the key independent variable. Articles relevant to the evaluation of the impact of BV on aerobic capacity and endurance performance were reviewed according to the strengths of the individual study designs. RESULTS: Seven investigations evaluated the impact of acute changes in BV, independent of changes in [Hb], on VO2max. Of these investigations, three revealed that acute manipulations of BV result in no change or a slight reduction in VO2max. Three investigations revealed a significant improvement in VO2max after acute PV expansion. One investigation revealed a nonsignificant increase in VO2max after acute PV expansion. Seven investigations evaluated the impact of acute changes in BV, independent of changes in [Hb], on endurance performance: two revealed a significant improvement in endurance performance after acute PV expansion, and five revealed an unchanged or reduced endurance performance after acute PV expansion. The majority of investigations showing an improvement in VO2max and/or endurance performance after acute PV expansion were conducted using untrained individuals. CONCLUSION: Volume loading does not result in an improvement in VO2max and/or endurance performance in endurance athletes. Volume loading in untrained individuals may improve VO2max, but does not bring these individuals to the aerobic capacity of endurance-trained athletes. Also, volume loading generally does not lead to improvement in endurance performance, irrespective of its effects on VO2max.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".