MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026322773 · doi:10.1039/c2sc20565c

Exploring the thermal stability of DNA-linked gold nanoparticles in ionic liquids and molecular solvents

2012· article· en· W2026322773 on OpenAlexaff
Arsalan Beg Menhaj, Brendan D. Smith, Juewen Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIonic liquidSolventChemistryColloidal goldDNANanomaterialsNanoparticleThermal stabilityBase pairBase (topology)Chemical engineeringInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryNanotechnologyMaterials scienceCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While water is the most commonly used solvent for DNA, many co-solvents have been added for various applications. Ionic liquids (ILs) are molten salts at around room temperature. ILs have been tested as a green solvent for many reactions and many biopolymers can also be dissolved in ILs. In this work, we study DNA-linked gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) in seven types of ILs. DNA-functionalized AuNPs possess a high density of negative charges and thus may generate new physical properties in ILs. We have identified the role of ILs to transit from salts to increase DNA duplex stability to solvents to decrease DNA melting temperature. The onset of this transition depends on the structure of ILs, where more hydrophobic cations destabilize DNA at lower IL concentrations. This trend is opposite to molecular solvents (e.g. ethanol, DMSO, ACN and DMF) that destabilize DNA at low solvent concentration. Specific DNA base pairing is disrupted at high DMSO concentrations, and AuNPs are held together by non-specific interactions. The other tested molecular solvents are able to maintain DNA base pairs, although strong non-specific interactions are also present. Several ILs can release proton and thus drastically change pH, which also changes the melting temperature of DNA. This study also reveals the feasibility of using ILs as solvents for DNA-functionalized nanomaterials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical ScienceSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207