MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract P4-11-06: Population Based Outcomes after Whole Brain Radiotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer in the Pre and Post Trastuzumab Eras

2010· article· en· W2026326021 on OpenAlexaff
Scott Tyldesley, Irene Karam, Alan Nichol, Ryan Woods, Caroline Speers, Hagen F. Kennecke

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBrain Metastases and Treatment
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTrastuzumabBreast cancerBrain metastasisOncologyInternal medicineProportional hazards modelRadiation therapyMetastatic breast cancerCancerPopulationLog-rank testMultivariate analysisMetastasis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: In the Pre-trastuzumab (Pre-T) era, survival rates after brain radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer patients were 4 to 8 months. Trastuzumab (T) was approved and funded in British Columbia in the metastatic setting in 1999. We examined the survival of Her2-positive and negative metastatic breast cancer at a provincial level in the Pre-T and T eras after brain RT. Material and Methods: All women with a diagnosis of breast cancer between 2000 and 2007 (T era) who were treated with brain RT in British Columbia were identified. A series of cases with brain metastasis from breast cancer treated with brain irradiation diagnosed between 1986 and 1992 with banked tissue on which Her-2 testing had been performed were also identified (Pre-T era). Date of death was determined from the tumour registry. Baseline prognostic factors were compared using Chi Square for categorical data, and t-test for continuous data. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons between eras and between her-2 groups were done with a log-rank test. Variables significant for survival on log-rank test were entered into a Cox regression for multivariate analysis for each era separately. Results: A total of 455 women with brain metastases from breast cancer were identified from the T era, and 131 were identified from the Pre-T era. The median age at diagnosis was 53 years in both eras. The percentage of cases with ER-positive (43% and 41% p=0.2) and Grade 3 tumours (74% and 67%, p=0.2) were not statistically different. The percentage of cases with Her2-positive disease were statistically different the two eras (29% in Pre-T and 46% in the T eras, p=<0.001). Of the T era Her2-positive patients, 85% received T. The median time from diagnosis to brain RT was longer in the pre-T era (3.3 years versus 2.3 years, p< 0.001). The most common prescription used for whole brain RT was 20 Gy in 5 fractions in both eras, however it was more common in the pre-T era (87%) compared to the T era (68%) (p=<0.001). Although stereotactic radiotherapy, which first became available in our region in 1997, was occasionally used as a boost in BC, all but 15 (11%) of the pre-T era patients had died prior to its availability. Survival was longer after whole brain RT in the T era (1 year survival 27% versus 14%, log rank p=0.07). In the T era, one year survival was better for those with Her2 positive disease in the T era (39%) compared to those with Her2 negative disease (19%) in the T era (p-value < 0.0001), and to those with Her 2 positive disease in the pre-T era (3%, P<0.001). In the pre-T era, although 1 year survival was better (18%) for Her2 negative disease compared to Her2 positive disease (3%), the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.1). In a Cox model, RT dose and ER status were significant variables in both eras, but Her2 status and age were only significant variables in the T era (p all < 0.001). Discussion: For patients with Her2 negative disease, there was no difference in survival after RT for brain metastases between the Pre-T and T eras. However, for patients with Her2 positive disease, survival after RT for brain metastases has increased significantly in the trastuzumab era. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-06.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicBrain Metastases and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207