MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026351291 · doi:10.1021/jp100277s

Electronic Structures and Optical Properties of 6H- and 3C-SiC Microstructures and Nanostructures from X-ray Absorption Fine Structures, X-ray Excited Optical Luminescence, and Theoretical Studies

2010· article· en· W2026351291 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLuminescenceMaterials scienceExcited stateNanowireXANESAbsorption edgeAbsorption (acoustics)PhotoluminescenceMolecular physicsOptoelectronicsBand gapAtomic physicsSpectral lineChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a comparative study of the electronic and optical properties of five silicon carbide (SiC) materials of different crystal structures (6H and 3C polytypes), sizes (micro- and nanocrystals), and morphologies (nanowires of SiC−SiO 2 core−shell structures and oxide-free nanowires). X-ray absorption near-edge structures (XANES) at both Si K- and C K-edge have been used to investigate the electronic structures of SiC. Theoretical calculations using density functional theory (DFT), the WIEN2k code are in good accord with the experiment. It is found that both 6H- and 3C-SiC have similar XANES at Si K-edge hence similar local structure at the Si site but slightly and more noticeable difference at the C K-edge, which is due to the difference in band gaps among the polytypes. The spectra of core−shell nanowires are found to have both SiO 2 and SiC contributions in which SiO 2 is dominant. The SiO 2 shell can be almost completely removed by hydrofluoric acid treatment. X-ray excited optical luminescence (XEOL) was used to measure light emission from SiC by tuning the excitation photon energy across both Si K- and C K-edge. Luminescence was observed from all SiC samples upon X-ray excitation, though at different wavelengths depending on the crystal structures and morphologies. By measuring the yield of the total luminescence (300−800 nm) and luminescence at selected wavelengths with excitation photon energy across the absorption edge, we are able to ascribe the luminescence at various wavelengths to surface states and defects, quantum confinement, and SiO 2 surface/SiC-SiO 2 interface in core−shell nanowires. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it