MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026362735 · doi:10.1177/0961203307078068

Review: Making the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus in children and adolescents

2007· review· en· W2026362735 on OpenAlexaff
Tucker Lb

Bibliographic record

VenueLupus · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRashDiseaseSystemic lupus erythematosusDifferential diagnosisPediatricsDermatologySystemic lupusLupus erythematosusArthritisMalar rashImmunologyIntensive care medicineInternal medicinePathologyAnti-nuclear antibodyAutoantibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Approximately 15% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) will have the onset of their disease in childhood or adolescence. Due to the broad range of possible clinical features of SLE, the diagnosis may be difficult to make in a general pediatric or community setting. The common symptoms of SLE in children and adolescents include fever, fatigue, weight loss, arthritis, rash and renal disease. SLE is more common in non-Caucasian ethnic groups and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a multisystem disease in these patients. In this article, the classification criteria for SLE are discussed, and an approach to making an accurate and timely diagnosis of this disease is considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLupusSame topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchFrench-language works237,207