Development of a Stabilized Form of the Regulatory CK2β Subunit That Inhibits Cell Proliferation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A number of cancers are characterized by elevated expression of CK2 (formerly casein kinase II), which has been implicated as a key component in cell proliferation and transformation. Two lines of evidence, (a) deregulated expression of CK2 and (b) CK2beta ubiquitination and degradation of these in a proteasome-dependent manner prompted further investigation of the regulation of CK2beta protein stability. We demonstrate that mutating six surface-exposed lysine residues to arginine (6KR) to interfere with ubiquitin attachment can stabilize CK2beta. Examination of 6KR expression in cells revealed increased stability over time and increased its steady-state expression level compared with CK2beta. In cells, 6KR was no longer sensitive to proteasome inhibition but maintained an elevated expression level. In our studies, 6KR functioned as a normal CK2 regulatory subunit, because it participated in CK2beta dimerization, associated with catalytic subunits, was autophosphorylated, and formed active, stable CK2 tetramers. The physiological role of CK2beta stabilization was investigated in cell proliferation assays, which showed a significant decrease in proliferation in cells expressing 6KR compared with CK2beta. Overall, our results indicate that a stabilized form of CK2beta can be used to inhibit cell proliferation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".