Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gap junctions and connexins are critical for coordinating cellular functions in complex epithelia. In recent years there has been increased interest in understanding the regulation and function of gap junctions in both the testis and epididymis. Studies in transgenic mice in which connexin 43 (Cx43) is mutated or is knocked down only in Sertoli cells have demonstrated the essential role of Cx43 in spermatogenesis and differentiation of Sertoli cells. In the epididymis developmental studies have shown a role for numerous connexins in the differentiation of epithelial cells and communication between the basal cells and both principal and clear cells. In both tissues several factors, such thyroid hormones and androgens, are important in regulating expression and function of connexins. Pannexins, which form cellular channels but are structurally similar to gap junction proteins, have been identified in both testis and epididymis and, in the epididymis, are regulated by androgens. The objective of this review is to summarize the advances that have been made on the role and regulation of connexins and pannexins in the testis and epididymis and their implication in spermatogenesis and sperm maturation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it