MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026443396 · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/36/46/003

Localization of a random copolymer at an interface: an exact enumeration study

2003· article· en· W2026443396 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics A Mathematical and General · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsEnumerationVertex (graph theory)CombinatoricsPhase diagramLattice (music)Simple cubic latticeRandom walkCopolymerMathematicsPhysicsPhase (matter)Quantum mechanicsMonte Carlo methodNuclear magnetic resonanceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a self-avoiding walk on the simple cubic lattice, as a model of localization of a random copolymer at an interface between two immiscible liquids. The vertices of the walk are coloured A or B randomly and independently. The two liquid phases are represented by the two half-spaces z> 0 and z < 0, and the plane z = 0 corresponds to the interface between the two liquids. The energy depends on the numbers of A-vertices with positive z-coordinate and B-vertices with negative z-coordinate. In addition there is a vertex–interface interaction, irrespective of the colour of the vertex. We use exact enumeration and series analysis techniques to investigate the form of the phase diagram and how it changes as the magnitude of the vertex–interface interaction changes. PACS number: 05.40.Fb 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.301
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it