MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026470633 · doi:10.1115/imece2011-64000

Dynamic Analysis of Three Parallel Beams With Electrostatic Force Interaction

2011· article· en· W2026470633 on OpenAlexaff
Pezhman A. Hassanpour, Patricia Nieva, Amir Khajepour

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 7: Dynamic Systems and Control; Mechatronics and Intelligent Machines, Parts A and B · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCantileverEquations of motionBeam (structure)Stability (learning theory)Modal analysisTime domainMechanicsPhysicsMaterials scienceClassical mechanicsComputer scienceAcousticsStructural engineeringVibrationEngineeringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the dynamics of a micro-machined structure with three parallel cantilevers is investigated. The cantilevers are electrically charged and apply electrostatic force to each other. The governing equations of motion are derived using Euler-Bernoulli beam theory and considering structural modal damping. The stability condition of the beams for various electric charges is also studied. In addition, the equations of motion are integrated to obtain the response of the beams in time-domain for a range of initial conditions. This response is used to study the behavior of the beams at the stability margin. The end application of the structure under investigation is in the device characterization. The dynamic stability condition and time-domain responses are used to investigate the reliability of the characterization. Once translated back to physical quantities, these results can be used for improving the measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 7: Dynamic Systems and Control; Mechatronics and Intelligent Machines, Parts A and BSame topicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207