MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026477653 · doi:10.1002/cjg2.3555

2.5‐D CSAMT Modeling with Finite Element Method Over 2‐D Complex Earth Media

2004· article· en· W2026477653 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Journal of Geophysics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInversion (geology)GeophysicsAnomaly (physics)Field (mathematics)DipoleElectric fieldFinite element methodGeologyElectrical resistivity and conductivityFrequency domainMagnetic dipoleComputational physicsPhysicsMathematical analysisSeismologyMathematicsCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper will discuss the characteristics of EM field for 2‐D complex earth media. Firstly we introduce the characteristics of electric field, magnetic field, apparent resistivity, and phase induced by a finite electrical dipole source over 100m homogeneous half‐space media. From this result we can know the field change behavior with the distance from transmitter to receiver, and also the result tells us we should use proper transmitting‐receiving mode. In wave number domain, the EM field shows that the field of low wave number contributes much more than the one of high wave number. And then we demonstrate the CSAMT forward modeling of apparent resistivity, phase pseudosections and frequency curves for two anomaly bodies, two slanting anomaly bodies and down faulted anomaly. Numerical modeling results show directly the anomaly characteristics, this is very helpful for understanding field data and data inversion and interpretation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.553
Threshold uncertainty score0.600

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it