Bibliographic record
Abstract
As members of the recent National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guideline update for schizophrenia 1 (M.B. and D.S.), we read with interest the excellent meta-analysis of CBT for symptoms of schizophrenia by Jauhar et al. 2 The results are broadly in line with the NICE review and particularly that of Wykes et al, 3 which showed that studies with high methodological rigour, including masking, have a small effect size for positive and total symptoms. Clearly cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) is no panacea; but neither is it ineffective. Meta-analyses bring together all trials, with patients drawn from heterogeneous populations, including different phases of illness. The tests for 488 Contents & Is depression one thing or many? & CBT for psychosis: not a 'quasi-neuroleptic' & Stimulant treatment for ADHD & Liaison services for older adults & Assessing and staging bipolar disorder
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".