The time course of diameter increment responses to selection harvests in <i>Acer saccharum</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We used dendroecological techniques to analyze the temporal pattern in diameter growth following selection harvests in stands dominated by Acer saccharum Marsh. in central Ontario and examined differences in growth responses related to tree size, damage, and orientation relative to canopy gaps. While dendroecological studies have commonly assumed that trees show immediate growth responses to gap creation (i.e., within 12 years), we found that the growth enhancement in A. saccharum was gradual and did not reach a peak until 35 years following gap creation. Trees of intermediate size showed the largest proportional growth increases after gap creation, with the largest responses observed in trees on the north side of gaps. Trees with visible damage to the crown or bole had significantly lower preharvest basal area increments than trees with little or no damage, but showed greater proportional growth responses to gap creation. Both the long observed time delay in tree growth response to canopy opening and the variability in response relative to tree size and damage have important implications for attempts to reconstruct disturbance history using dendroecological methods and to sustainable forest management under selection system silviculture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".