MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026544511 · doi:10.5539/mas.v3n1p129

Treatment and Reuse of Tannery Waste Water by Embedded System

2008· article· en· W2026544511 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
S. Krishanamoorthi, K. Saravanan, T.V. Sriram Prabhu

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicDye analysis and toxicity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReuseEffluentWater scarcityEnvironmental scienceScarcityWork (physics)Table (database)Scale (ratio)Waste managementComputer scienceProcess engineeringEnvironmental engineeringWater resourcesEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to scarcity of water problem in India especially southern part of India the large number small and medium scale industries are facing hectic loss in production. On the other hand the effluent discharged from these industries contaminates the water table and water sources. In this juncture, a novel technology should be developed to overcome these problems. Hence the present work focuses attention on the novel methods for treatment of tanner effluent and reuse for other purposes. For this purpose the experiments have been conducted by embedding UF and RO. Experiments have been performed for both UF and RO by varying the pressure and load to the membranes against the flux. Finally, based on the experimental results a suitable embedded system has been suggested for treating tannery effluent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicDye analysis and toxicityFrench-language works237,207