MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026560951 · doi:10.1049/iet-rsn.2012.0027

Interference and multipath mitigation utilising a two‐stage beamformer for global navigation satellite systems applications

2013· article· en· W2026560951 on OpenAlexaff
Saeed Daneshmand, Ali Broumandan, John Nielsen, Gérard Lachapelle

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Radar Sonar & Navigation · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultipath mitigationMultipath propagationInterference (communication)Multipath interferenceSatelliteComputer scienceStage (stratigraphy)Communications satelliteRemote sensingTelecommunicationsEngineeringGeologyAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The performance of location‐based services provided by global navigation satellite systems is compromised by interference and multipath propagations. Although time/frequency interference suppression methods have been widely studied in the literature, they fail to cope with wideband interference signals. Instead, techniques utilising several antenna elements can be employed to mitigate both narrowband and broadband interference signals. However, the performance of beamforming techniques utilising antenna arrays severely degrades in dealing with correlated and coherent multipath components which cause signal cancellation phenomenon and temporal correlation matrix rank deficiency. This study proposes a two‐stage beamformer to jointly deal with interference and multipath signals. In the first stage, before the despreading process, by applying the subspace method, the interference subspace is estimated and used as a constraint for the optimisation problem in the next stage. In the second stage, a modified version of the minimum power distortionless response beamformer employing several overlapping sub‐arrays called the minimum difference output power method is utilised to mitigate the correlated multipath components. The proposed beamformer can deal with the signal cancellation phenomenon and temporal correlation matrix rank deficiency. Several simulation examples and a real data test are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed beamformer. Results show that the proposed method is able to put deep nulls in the direction of the narrowband and wideband interference signals, and significantly reduces the multipath‐induced time of the arrival error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Radar Sonar & NavigationSame topicGNSS positioning and interferenceFrench-language works237,207