Family Shuffling of a Targeted <i>bphA</i> Region To Engineer Biphenyl Dioxygenase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work we used a new strategy designed to reduce the size of the library that needs to be explored in family shuffling to evolve new biphenyl dioxygenases (BPDOs). Instead of shuffling the whole gene, we have targeted a fragment of bphA that is critical for enzyme specificity. We also describe a new protocol to screen for more potent BPDOs that is based on the detection of catechol metabolites from chlorobiphenyls. Several BphA variants with extended potency to degrade polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were obtained by shuffling critical segments of bphA genes from Burkholderia sp. strain LB400, Comamonas testosteroni B-356, and Rhodococcus globerulus P6. Unlike all parents, these variants exhibited high activity toward 2,2'-, 3,3'-, and 4,4'-dichlorobiphenyls and were able to oxygenate the very persistent 2,6-dichlorobiphenyl. The data showed that the replacement of a short segment (335TFNNIRI341) of LB400 BphA by the corresponding segment (333GINTIRT339) of B-356 BphA or P6 BphA contributes to relax the enzyme toward PCB substrates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".