Dipolar gyres generated by continuous forcing on a polar β-plane
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dipolar vortices generated by a force applied to an area of finite size are investigated in a rotating, polar β-plane fluid. The laboratory polar β-plane is dynamically equivalent to the polar regions of the ocean or the atmosphere where the Coriolis parameter varies quadratically with latitude. Both forced and unforced evolution of the flow is observed. The altimetric imaging velocimetry method is employed for imaging the rotating flows and measuring the velocity and surface elevation fields. The forced dipoles were observed to rotate in the anticyclonic direction from their initial orientation where the axis of the dipole is aligned with the direction of the force toward some steady state where the axis of the dipole is at an angle to the direction of the force. The theoretical prediction of the rotation angle is found to be in good agreement with the experimental results. Asymptotic solutions for limiting cases when forced dipoles are affected either by the Ekman-type bottom friction or by the γ-effect are found. The experiments also demonstrate that the unforced free dipoles rotate anticyclonically with almost steady rate and emit basin-scale Rossby waves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".