MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Controversy surrounding the existence of discrete functional classes of astrocytes in adult gray matter

2000· review· en· W2026627501 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGlia · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlial fibrillary acidic proteinBiologyAstrocyteNeuroscienceElectrophysiologyIon channelNeurogliaCell typePatch clampCell biologyBiophysicsCentral nervous systemCellBiochemistryImmunologyImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since 1992, it has been possible to record ionic currents from identified astrocytes in situ, using brain slice technology. Brain slice recordings confirm previous in vitro findings that expression of voltage-gated K(+) and Na(+) channels are a feature of this cell type. In contrast to cultured astrocytes, most investigators found that astrocytes in situ did not contain detectable, or at very best only low, levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). Structural and immunocytochemical investigations determined that these cells are different from oligodendrocyte precursors. In addition to cells with this current pattern, many but not all investigators found a second pool of astrocytes with no voltage-gated ion channels and high GFAP content. These two subpopulations of cells were termed complex and passive astrocytes. The existence of passive astrocytes has been questioned because of possible problems with space clamp conditions and spillage of EGTA-buffered pipette solution around the cells before recordings. Another problem is the fact there is a discrepancy regarding the GFAP content of complex astrocytes. It is of interest that recent immunocytochemical studies suggest the existence of two pools of astrocytes, one with a high GFAP content and one with nondetectable GFAP. Given this, it is tempting to correlate the two (controversial) electrophysiological patterns with immunochemical differences (GFAP) in order to demonstrate two functionally discrete classes of astrocytes in adult gray matter. However, despite evidence that some of the K(+) channels may be involved in proliferation, the role of voltage-gated ion channels in this nonexcitable cell type remains unknown. This is despite the fact that astrocytic Na(+) channels show dramatic changes after pathological events, re-enforcing the notion that the expression of this channel is under tight neuronal control. Several studies suggest that there is a great degree of flexibility and that astrocytes can undergo rapid changes in expression of both membrane ion currents and GFAP. Although it is likely that astrocytes exhibit different structural and membrane properties, this heterogeneity might be a reflection of the flexible plasticity of one astrocyte type under influence of environmental factors rather than of the existence of two distinct and permanent subtypes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it