On measuring creep behaviour in granular materials through triaxial testing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first part of the paper describes the precision and long-term stability that are required in triaxial stress-strain measurements and in stress-path control systems to obtain reliable information on creep in granular media. It is shown that membrane penetration and sample end compliance must be accounted for and that lubricated ends and local strain measurements are essential. The temperature sensitivity of each transducer also needs to be assessed, even when working in a temperature-controlled laboratory. The second part of the paper presents illustrative data that were obtained in tests on sand and Ballotini® glass beads. Considerable creep deformations were observed under both isotropic and anisotropic effective stress conditions, even at relatively low pressures where particle breakage was unlikely to be significant. The experiments show how creep depends on the stress conditions imposed, how the strain increment directions change during creep, and how the creep rates stabilize with time.Key words: sand, creep, triaxial test, yielding, membrane penetration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it