MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026696138 · doi:10.1504/ijpelec.2011.042308

Classification and comparison of interfacing schemes for connecting fuel cells to a single-phase utility line

2011· article· en· W2026696138 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Power Electronics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPower Systems and Renewable Energy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterfacingSingle phaseLine (geometry)Phase (matter)Computer scienceEngineeringAutomotive engineeringElectrical engineeringChemistryComputer hardwareMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on a systematic classification of dc source to utility interfacing schemes, this paper presents six major interfacing schemes for connecting fuel cells to a single-phase utility line using high-frequency transformer isolated power converters. The operation, advantages and disadvantages are discussed for each scheme with examples and operating waveforms. Several features e.g., utility line power factor, line current THD, size, ease of connection to utility line and simplicity of control, are compared. Based on their performance and fuel cell characteristics, a suitable scheme is selected. The selected scheme (#4) uses a dc/dc converter followed by a current controlled voltage source inverter. Details of the power conditioning unit (PCU) based on the selected scheme are given with some PSIM simulation results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it