Rotational spectroscopic study of carbonyl sulfide solvated with hydrogen molecules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rotational spectra of small-sized (H(2))(N)-OCS clusters with N = 2-7 were measured using a pulsed-jet Fourier transform microwave spectrometer. These include spectra of pure (para-H(2))(N)-OCS clusters, pure (ortho-H(2))(N)-OCS clusters, and mixed ortho-H(2) and para-H(2) containing clusters. The rotational lines of ortho-H(2) molecules containing clusters show proton spin-proton spin hyperfine structure, and the pattern evolves as the number of ortho-H(2) molecules in the cluster increases. Various isotopologues of the clusters were investigated, including those with O(13)CS, OC(33)S, OC(34)S, and O(13)C(34)S. Nuclear quadrupole hyperfine structures of rotational transitions were observed for (33)S (nuclear spin quantum number I = 3/2) containing isotopologues. The (33)S nuclear quadrupole coupling constants are compared to the corresponding constant of the OCS monomer and those of the He(N)-OCS clusters. The assignment of the number of solvating hydrogen molecules N is supported by the analyses of the proton spin-proton spin hyperfine structures of the mixed clusters, the dependence of line intensities on sample conditions (pressure and concentrations), and the agreement of the (para-H(2))(N)-OCS and (ortho-H(2))(N)-OCS rotational constants with those from a previous infrared study [J. Tang and A. R. W. McKellar, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 3087 (2004)].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".