MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026711372 · doi:10.1002/art.39132

International Consensus Guidance Statement on the Management and Treatment of IgG4‐Related Disease

2015· review· en· W2026711372 on OpenAlexaff
Arezou Khosroshahi, Zachary S. Wallace, Jayne Littlejohn Crowe, Takashi Akamizu, Atsushi Azumi, Mollie N. Carruthers, Suresh T. Chari, Emanuel Della‐Torre, Luca Frulloni, Hiroshi Gotô, Phil A. Hart, Terumi Kamisawa, Shigeyuki Kawa, Mitsuhiro Kawano, M. H. Kim, Yuzo Kodama, Kensuke Kubota, Markus M. Lerch, Matthias Löhr, Yasufumi Masaki, Shoko Matsui, Tsuneyo Mimori, Shôji Nakamura, Takahiro Nakazawa, Hitomi Ohara, Kazuichi Okazaki, Jay H. Ryu, Takako Saeki, N. Schleinitz, Akira Shimatsu, Tooru Shimosegawa, Hiroki Takahashi, Masayuki Takahira, Atsushi Tanaka, Mark Topazian, Hisanori Umehara, George Webster, Thomas E. Witzig, Motohisa Yamamoto, Wen Zhang, T. Chiba, John H. Stone

Bibliographic record

VenueArthritis & Rheumatology · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIgG4-Related and Inflammatory Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersGenentechAmgen
KeywordsTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A. Khosroshahi, Z. S. Wallace, J. L. Crowe, T. Akamizu, A. Azumi, M. N. Carruthers, S. T. Chari, E. Della-Torre, L. Frulloni, H. Goto, P. A. Hart, T. Kamisawa, S. Kawa, M. Kawano, M. H. Kim, Y. Kodama, K. Kubota, M. M. Lerch, M. L€ ohr, Y. Masaki, S. Matsui, T. Mimori, S. Nakamura, T. Nakazawa, H. Ohara, K. Okazaki, J. H. Ryu, T. Saeki, N. Schleinitz, A. Shimatsu, T. Shimosegawa, H. Takahashi, M. Takahira, A. Tanaka, M. Topazian, H. Umehara, G. J. Webster, T. E. Witzig, M. Yamamoto, W. Zhang, T. Chiba, and J. H. Stone

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1,051
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArthritis & RheumatologySame topicIgG4-Related and Inflammatory DiseasesFrench-language works237,207