Bilateral Magnetic Micromanipulation Using Off-Board Force Sensor
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper introduces a novel haptic-enabled magnetic micromanipulation platform with promising potential for extensive biological and biomedical applications. This platform consists of two separated basic sites: 1) the slave site that uses a controlled magnetic field for manipulating a ferromagnetic microdevice and 2) the master site that uses a haptic-enabled device for the position and the force communication between the human operator and the microdevice. Due to the size restriction of the microdevice, attaching force sensors to the microdevice is impractical. Thus, to preserve a high feeling of a microdomain environment for the human operator, the applied force/torque from the environment to the microdevice is estimated with a novel off-board force sensing mechanism. This force sensing mechanism uses the produced magnetic flux information and the real position of the microdevice to estimate the environmental force applied to the microdevice. A scaled force-position teleoperation scheme is employed for this haptic application to scale down the macrodomain position for microdomain application and scale up the microdomain force for macrodomain sensing of the human operator. Conducting several experiments in different conditions, precise motion tracking with high accurate force transfer to human operator has been reported, RMS of position tracking errors of 0.2 mm with 1.27- <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math>$\mu$</tex-math></inline-formula> N accuracy force sensing for single-axis motion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it