MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026774405 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.090213

What's New in Laboratory Research?

2009· article· en· W2026774405 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Carlo Pincelli, Roberta Lotti

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Rheumatology Supplement · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsoriasisEpidermis (zoology)KeratinocyteMedicineImmunologyEffectorImmune systemIntegrinCell biologyPathogenesisCancer researchBiologyReceptorCell cultureInternal medicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Psoriasis is a multigenic disease with a number of susceptibility loci on different chromosomes predisposing to the disease, which is in turn triggered by environmental factors. The pathogenesis of psoriasis is characterized by 2 main components, the dysfunctions of the immune system and the alteration of keratinocyte homeostasis. While the Th1 T cell response has long been considered the sole immune agent in the pathomechanisms of psoriasis, recently, the role of IL-23-driven Th17 has been shown to be predominant. Subsequently, only effector memory T cells expressing alpha1beta1 integrin migrate into the epidermis, and psoriasis development is inhibited by blocking this integrin. Psoriatic epidermis contains high amounts of antimicrobial peptides, which have been shown to be a key mediator of plasmocytoid dendritic cell activation in psoriasis. The keratinocyte component has recently regained the central stage, as the abrogation of JunB/activator protein 1 in mouse keratinocytes induces development of psoriasiform lesions in T cell deficient mice. Moreover, inhibition of nerve growth factor and its receptor in keratinocytes strikingly improves psoriatic lesions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.008
Scholarly communication0.0130.018
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0080.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0650.048

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Rheumatology SupplementSame topicPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisFrench-language works237,207