Solution and Solid-State Properties of Luminescent M−M Bond-Containing Coordination/Organometallic Polymers Using the RNC-M<sub>2</sub>(dppm)<sub>2</sub>-CNR Building Blocks (M = Pd, Pt; R = Aryl, Alkyl)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two families of organometallic polymers built upon the bimetallic M2(dppm)2L(2)2+ fragments (M = Pd, Pt; dppm = bis(diphenylphosphino)methane, L = 1,4-diisocyano-2,3,5,6-tetramethylbenzene (diiso), 1,8-diisocyano-p-menthane (dmb), 1-isocyano-2,6-dimethylbenzene, 1-isocyano-4-isopropylbenzene, and tert-butylisocyanide) were synthesized and fully characterized (1H and 31P NMR, X-ray crystallography (model compounds), IR, Raman, chem. anal., TGA, DSC, powder XRD, 31P NMR T1 and NOE, light scattering, and conductivity measurements). Evidence for polymers in the solid state is provided from the swelling of the polymers upon dissolution and the formation of stand-alone films. However, these species become small oligomers when dissolved. The materials are luminescent in the solid state at 298 and 77 K and in PrCN solution at 77 K. These emissions result from triplet 3(d sigma d sigma*) states despite the presence of low-lying pi-pi* MO levels according to DFT calculations for the aryl isocyanide model compounds. The emission band maxima are located between 640 and 750 nm and exhibit lifetimes of 3-6 ns for the Pd species and 3-4 micros for the Pt analogues in PrCN solution at 77 K. No evidence of intramolecular excitonic photoprocesses was found in any of the polymers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".